{
  "id": "oai:papers.qnfo.org:higgs-particle-never-existed",
  "slug": "higgs-particle-never-existed",
  "title": "Higgs Particle Never Existed",
  "authors": [
    "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas"
  ],
  "abstract": "The 2012 announcement of the discovery of a new boson at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was interpreted as the detection of the Higgs particle, a foundational component of the Standard Model. This document presents a formal proof, derived from the first principles of quantum field theory, measurement theory, and Bayesian inference, that this interpretation constitutes a category error. The observed 125 GeV signal is demonstrated to be a statistical feature—the mode of a likelihood function—whose properties are overwhelmingly determined by the finite resolution of the detector, rather than an ontological entity corresponding to a discrete, localized particle. An axiomatic analysis of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) establishes that the Higgs field, which possesses a non-zero decay width, cannot support the asymptotic particle states required for a particle ontology. Furthermore, a measurement-theoretic proof quantifies that detector resolution effects account for 99.999816% of the observed signal width, rendering the intrinsic width of the resonance unobservable. [...]",
  "abstract_markdown": "The 2012 announcement of the discovery of a new boson at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was interpreted as the detection of the Higgs particle, a foundational component of the Standard Model. This document presents a formal proof, derived from the first principles of quantum field theory, measurement theory, and Bayesian inference, that this interpretation constitutes a category error. The observed 125 GeV signal is demonstrated to be a statistical feature—the mode of a likelihood function—whose properties are overwhelmingly determined by the finite resolution of the detector, rather than an ontological entity corresponding to a discrete, localized particle. An axiomatic analysis of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) establishes that the Higgs field, which possesses a non-zero decay width, cannot support the asymptotic particle states required for a particle ontology. Furthermore, a measurement-theoretic proof quantifies that detector resolution effects account for 99.999816% of the observed signal width, rendering the intrinsic width of the resonance unobservable. [...]",
  "date": "2025-09-01",
  "first_published": "2025-09-01",
  "last_revised": "2025-09-01T00:00:00Z",
  "modified": "2025-09-01T00:00:00Z",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "version_count": 1,
  "language": "en",
  "keywords": [],
  "quality_tags": [
    "High-quality scholarly research",
    "open-access scholarly work",
    "versioned research publication"
  ],
  "quality_label": "High-quality scholarly research",
  "quality_basis": "QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
  "quality_evidence_url": "https://qnfo.org/about",
  "peer_review_status": "Not independently peer-reviewed",
  "resource_type": "ScholarlyArticle",
  "doi": null,
  "doi_url": null,
  "url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/higgs-particle-never-existed",
  "license_url": "https://legal.qnfo.org/",
  "license_spdx": null,
  "sha256": "d70496c0dd4ccb3908ad5d4da88357473075068454967150ca9763e0c04aa0fc",
  "version_url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/higgs-particle-never-existed/v/1.0.0",
  "datacite": {
    "schemaVersion": "http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4",
    "identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/higgs-particle-never-existed",
        "identifierType": "URL"
      }
    ],
    "creators": [
      {
        "name": "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas",
        "nameType": "Personal",
        "nameIdentifiers": [
          {
            "nameIdentifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4317-5604",
            "nameIdentifierScheme": "ORCID",
            "schemeUri": "https://orcid.org"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "titles": [
      {
        "title": "Higgs Particle Never Existed"
      }
    ],
    "publisher": "QNFO",
    "publicationYear": "2025",
    "resourceType": {
      "resourceTypeGeneral": "Text",
      "resourceType": "ScholarlyArticle"
    },
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "High-quality scholarly research",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "open-access scholarly work",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "versioned research publication",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      }
    ],
    "dates": [
      {
        "date": "2025-09-01",
        "dateType": "Issued"
      },
      {
        "date": "2025-09-01",
        "dateType": "Updated"
      }
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "rightsList": [
      {
        "rightsUri": "https://legal.qnfo.org/"
      }
    ],
    "descriptions": [
      {
        "description": "The 2012 announcement of the discovery of a new boson at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was interpreted as the detection of the Higgs particle, a foundational component of the Standard Model. This document presents a formal proof, derived from the first principles of quantum field theory, measurement theory, and Bayesian inference, that this interpretation constitutes a category error. The observed 125 GeV signal is demonstrated to be a statistical feature—the mode of a likelihood function—whose properties are overwhelmingly determined by the finite resolution of the detector, rather than an ontological entity corresponding to a discrete, localized particle. An axiomatic analysis of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) establishes that the Higgs field, which possesses a non-zero decay width, cannot support the asymptotic particle states required for a particle ontology. Furthermore, a measurement-theoretic proof quantifies that detector resolution effects account for 99.999816% of the observed signal width, rendering the intrinsic width of the resonance unobservable. [...]",
        "descriptionType": "Abstract"
      },
      {
        "description": "Publisher quality classification: High-quality scholarly research. QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      },
      {
        "description": "Peer review status: Not independently peer-reviewed",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      }
    ],
    "formats": [
      "text/html"
    ]
  }
}