{
  "id": "oai:papers.qnfo.org:imperfectly-defining-reality-1",
  "slug": "imperfectly-defining-reality-1",
  "title": "(Imperfectly) Defining Reality: Our Human Quest to Construct Reality from Science",
  "authors": [
    "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas"
  ],
  "abstract": "This inherent drive within the scientific method, particularly as it solidified during the Enlightenment and the subsequent rise of positivism, prioritizes the operationalization and quantification of phenomena. The need for repeatable experiments, shared understanding among researchers, and the construction of predictive frameworks necessitates the creation of precise, often rigid, definitions. Concepts must be pinned down, assigned measurable attributes, and fitted into logical structures. This impulse, deeply rooted in a particular epistemology that values empirical observation and logical analysis as the primary path to knowledge, forms the bedrock of modern scientific practice. It reflects a desire to carve nature into discrete, manageable units that can be isolated, studied, and manipulated. This quest for objective definition is not merely a practical necessity for communication; it embodies a philosophical stance, often implicitly realist, suggesting that these definitions correspond to fundamental, mind-independent features of reality. [...]",
  "abstract_markdown": "This inherent drive within the scientific method, particularly as it solidified during the Enlightenment and the subsequent rise of positivism, prioritizes the operationalization and quantification of phenomena. The need for repeatable experiments, shared understanding among researchers, and the construction of predictive frameworks necessitates the creation of precise, often rigid, definitions. Concepts must be pinned down, assigned measurable attributes, and fitted into logical structures. This impulse, deeply rooted in a particular epistemology that values empirical observation and logical analysis as the primary path to knowledge, forms the bedrock of modern scientific practice. It reflects a desire to carve nature into discrete, manageable units that can be isolated, studied, and manipulated. This quest for objective definition is not merely a practical necessity for communication; it embodies a philosophical stance, often implicitly realist, suggesting that these definitions correspond to fundamental, mind-independent features of reality. [...]",
  "date": "2026-01-01",
  "first_published": "2026-01-01",
  "last_revised": "2026-10-19T10:40:38Z",
  "modified": "2026-10-19T10:40:38Z",
  "version": "1.1.0",
  "version_count": 2,
  "language": "en",
  "keywords": [],
  "quality_tags": [
    "High-quality scholarly research",
    "open-access scholarly work",
    "versioned research publication"
  ],
  "quality_label": "High-quality scholarly research",
  "quality_basis": "QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
  "quality_evidence_url": "https://qnfo.org/about",
  "peer_review_status": "Not independently peer-reviewed",
  "resource_type": "ScholarlyArticle",
  "doi": null,
  "doi_url": null,
  "url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/imperfectly-defining-reality-1",
  "license_url": "https://legal.qnfo.org/",
  "license_spdx": null,
  "sha256": "9797d33ae27c20115610e1a74762e01d26b8d57cb15b605aa77d68efa2a7479e",
  "version_url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/imperfectly-defining-reality-1/v/1.1.0",
  "datacite": {
    "schemaVersion": "http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4",
    "identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/imperfectly-defining-reality-1",
        "identifierType": "URL"
      }
    ],
    "creators": [
      {
        "name": "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas",
        "nameType": "Personal",
        "nameIdentifiers": [
          {
            "nameIdentifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4317-5604",
            "nameIdentifierScheme": "ORCID",
            "schemeUri": "https://orcid.org"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "titles": [
      {
        "title": "(Imperfectly) Defining Reality: Our Human Quest to Construct Reality from Science"
      }
    ],
    "publisher": "QNFO",
    "publicationYear": "2026",
    "resourceType": {
      "resourceTypeGeneral": "Text",
      "resourceType": "ScholarlyArticle"
    },
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "High-quality scholarly research",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "open-access scholarly work",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "versioned research publication",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      }
    ],
    "dates": [
      {
        "date": "2026-01-01",
        "dateType": "Issued"
      },
      {
        "date": "2026-10-19",
        "dateType": "Updated"
      }
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "version": "1.1.0",
    "rightsList": [
      {
        "rightsUri": "https://legal.qnfo.org/"
      }
    ],
    "descriptions": [
      {
        "description": "This inherent drive within the scientific method, particularly as it solidified during the Enlightenment and the subsequent rise of positivism, prioritizes the operationalization and quantification of phenomena. The need for repeatable experiments, shared understanding among researchers, and the construction of predictive frameworks necessitates the creation of precise, often rigid, definitions. Concepts must be pinned down, assigned measurable attributes, and fitted into logical structures. This impulse, deeply rooted in a particular epistemology that values empirical observation and logical analysis as the primary path to knowledge, forms the bedrock of modern scientific practice. It reflects a desire to carve nature into discrete, manageable units that can be isolated, studied, and manipulated. This quest for objective definition is not merely a practical necessity for communication; it embodies a philosophical stance, often implicitly realist, suggesting that these definitions correspond to fundamental, mind-independent features of reality. [...]",
        "descriptionType": "Abstract"
      },
      {
        "description": "Publisher quality classification: High-quality scholarly research. QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      },
      {
        "description": "Peer review status: Not independently peer-reviewed",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      }
    ],
    "formats": [
      "text/html"
    ]
  }
}