{
  "id": "oai:papers.qnfo.org:proton-football",
  "slug": "proton-football",
  "title": "Proton Football",
  "authors": [
    "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas"
  ],
  "abstract": "How the “God Particle” Was Demoted to Just a “Mechanism” in the Standard Model of Particle Physics*** A profound epistemological schism exists at the foundation of contemporary high-energy physics: a systemic conflict between its operational reality as a relativistic quantum field theory and the particle-centric narrative used for institutional branding, public communication, and pedagogical framing. This dissonance is not a superficial matter of semantics but an ontological inconsistency that fosters methodological hypocrisy, distorts public understanding, and contributes to the current crisis of falsifiability in theoretical physics. The analysis of this schism begins with the formal duality of the Standard Model, contrasting its rigorous field-theoretic structure with the historically and pragmatically entrenched language of particles, a conflict exemplified by institutional outreach efforts that prioritize intuitive but obsolete classical models over the counter-intuitive but accurate principles of quantum field theory.",
  "abstract_markdown": "How the “God Particle” Was Demoted to Just a “Mechanism” in the Standard Model of Particle Physics*** A profound epistemological schism exists at the foundation of contemporary high-energy physics: a systemic conflict between its operational reality as a relativistic quantum field theory and the particle-centric narrative used for institutional branding, public communication, and pedagogical framing. This dissonance is not a superficial matter of semantics but an ontological inconsistency that fosters methodological hypocrisy, distorts public understanding, and contributes to the current crisis of falsifiability in theoretical physics. The analysis of this schism begins with the formal duality of the Standard Model, contrasting its rigorous field-theoretic structure with the historically and pragmatically entrenched language of particles, a conflict exemplified by institutional outreach efforts that prioritize intuitive but obsolete classical models over the counter-intuitive but accurate principles of quantum field theory.",
  "date": "2025-09-01",
  "first_published": "2025-09-01",
  "last_revised": "2026-09-14T19:32:59Z",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T19:32:59Z",
  "version": "2.0.0",
  "version_count": 2,
  "language": "en",
  "keywords": [],
  "quality_tags": [
    "High-quality scholarly research",
    "open-access scholarly work",
    "versioned research publication"
  ],
  "quality_label": "High-quality scholarly research",
  "quality_basis": "QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
  "quality_evidence_url": "https://qnfo.org/about",
  "peer_review_status": "Not independently peer-reviewed",
  "resource_type": "ScholarlyArticle",
  "doi": null,
  "doi_url": null,
  "url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/proton-football",
  "license_url": "https://legal.qnfo.org/",
  "license_spdx": null,
  "sha256": "58d8236941ffa8adbe288c50f72c7c861994b28015e729f2edcd1af7e4f8b71e",
  "version_url": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/proton-football/v/2.0.0",
  "datacite": {
    "schemaVersion": "http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4",
    "identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/proton-football",
        "identifierType": "URL"
      }
    ],
    "creators": [
      {
        "name": "Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas",
        "nameType": "Personal",
        "nameIdentifiers": [
          {
            "nameIdentifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4317-5604",
            "nameIdentifierScheme": "ORCID",
            "schemeUri": "https://orcid.org"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "titles": [
      {
        "title": "Proton Football"
      }
    ],
    "publisher": "QNFO",
    "publicationYear": "2025",
    "resourceType": {
      "resourceTypeGeneral": "Text",
      "resourceType": "ScholarlyArticle"
    },
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "High-quality scholarly research",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "open-access scholarly work",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      },
      {
        "subject": "versioned research publication",
        "subjectScheme": "QNFO publisher classification",
        "schemeUri": "https://qnfo.org/about"
      }
    ],
    "dates": [
      {
        "date": "2025-09-01",
        "dateType": "Issued"
      },
      {
        "date": "2026-09-14",
        "dateType": "Updated"
      }
    ],
    "language": "en",
    "version": "2.0.0",
    "rightsList": [
      {
        "rightsUri": "https://legal.qnfo.org/"
      }
    ],
    "descriptions": [
      {
        "description": "How the “God Particle” Was Demoted to Just a “Mechanism” in the Standard Model of Particle Physics*** A profound epistemological schism exists at the foundation of contemporary high-energy physics: a systemic conflict between its operational reality as a relativistic quantum field theory and the particle-centric narrative used for institutional branding, public communication, and pedagogical framing. This dissonance is not a superficial matter of semantics but an ontological inconsistency that fosters methodological hypocrisy, distorts public understanding, and contributes to the current crisis of falsifiability in theoretical physics. The analysis of this schism begins with the formal duality of the Standard Model, contrasting its rigorous field-theoretic structure with the historically and pragmatically entrenched language of particles, a conflict exemplified by institutional outreach efforts that prioritize intuitive but obsolete classical models over the counter-intuitive but accurate principles of quantum field theory.",
        "descriptionType": "Abstract"
      },
      {
        "description": "Publisher quality classification: High-quality scholarly research. QNFO publisher classification for open-access, versioned research with a public revision history and reader correction channel; this is not a claim of independent peer review.",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      },
      {
        "description": "Peer review status: Not independently peer-reviewed",
        "descriptionType": "Other"
      }
    ],
    "formats": [
      "text/html"
    ]
  }
}