QNFO Papers

Quick read · plain language

A New Physics Based on Information Limits

A plain-language version of “Information-Theoretic Reformation of Physics”

2 min readNo jargon, no mathematicsPhysics

The short version

The paper says physics should instead rest on the idea that all systems have a finite limit on how much information they can hold.

Why old physics took a wrong turn

The paper says physics made a big mistake about 125 years ago. Max Planck introduced a number to fix a math problem with hot objects glowing. Later, people treated this number as a deep truth about nature. The paper calls this number a curve-fitting tool, not a real constant. A curve-fitting tool is like adjusting a line on a graph to match dots. The paper says treating this tool as a real thing sent physics down a long wrong path.

The paper wants a new starting point for all of physics. Every physical system has a finite information capacity. This means no system with limited resources can hold or send endless information. This idea comes from work on how signals move through channels. The math rule says the top speed of information depends on the channel width and the signal clarity. Both of these are always limited in the real world.

Fixing the hot glow problem without jumps

Old physics had a problem called the ultraviolet catastrophe. A math rule for glowing hot objects predicted infinite energy, which is absurd. The paper says this was not a failure of smooth, continuous physics. It was a failure to add a physical limit: total energy must be finite.

The paper shows that adding a simple decay factor fixes the math. This factor makes high-frequency energy drop off fast. It is not fixed and universal.

What "quantum" effects really are

The paper rethinks many famous effects. Atomic spectra come from waves fitting in bounded spaces, like notes from a flute. The photoelectric effect comes from energy building up over time in waves, not from particle hits. The so-called collapse of the wavefunction is just updating beliefs when new data arrives, like revising a weather guess after looking outside.

The double-slit pattern builds up from sampling a weak continuous wave with a detector that has finite pixels. The Stern-Gerlach split comes from a wave packet separating into two lobes in a magnetic field, then being sampled.

What this does not show

The paper does not claim any new experiment has been done. It does not prove that its predictions about extreme conditions are true. It leaves open whether all of quantum technology can really be rebuilt on these lines. The claim that all past data fits this framework is stated, not demonstrated case by case.

Words used here

Curve-fitting
adjusting a line or curve so it matches measured points on a graph
Finite information capacity
the hard limit on how much data any real system can store or send
Ultraviolet catastrophe
an old math mistake where a model for glowing objects predicted infinite energy

Learn more in plain language

This plain-language version was written by an AI model from the text of the paper and checked against plain-language rules: everyday words, no mathematics, no unexplained names. It leaves details out and can still be wrong; the paper is the source of record. To report a problem, open the paper, select the passage and choose Report.

For specialists: the technical digest, quoted from the paper

In the paper's words

Physics must be reoriented around information-theoretic constraints rather than quantum mechanical assumptions. This reorientation requires a critical reevaluation of Planck’s constant as a curve-fitting parameter and the establishment of finite information capacity as a new axiom. The historical elevation of Planck’s constant to a universal constant represents a profound epistemological error that has shaped theoretical physics for over a century.

The abstract, verbatim, and its opening sentence is the claim. Every line below is quoted from the text.

Numbers it reports

  1. The maximum rate at which information can be transmitted over a communication channel is given by $C = B log₂(1 + S/N)$, where $C$ is the channel capacity, $B$ is the bandwidth, and $S/N$ is the signal-to-noise ratio (Shannon, 1948).

    from 1.2

How it is done

  1. 1.2.1 Formal Encoding of the Axiom: The Shannon-Hartley Theorem, $C = B log₂(1 + S/N) \lt ∞$ The Shannon-Hartley theorem provides the mathematical formalism for the finite information capacity axiom.

    from 1.2
  2. The law’s failure stems from its reliance on the equipartition theorem, which incorrectly assigns a constant average energy $ε(ν) = kT$ to every mode, regardless of frequency.

    from 2.1
  3. The Shannon-Hartley Theorem as the Supreme Physical Law: The Mathematical Proof That Information Capacity Constrains Energy Distribution The Shannon-Hartley theorem is a supreme physical law, showing that information capacity fundamentally constrains energy distribution (Shannon, 1948).

    from 3.
  4. Applying the Shannon-Hartley theorem, $C = B log₂(1 + SNR)$, the total information capacity $C$ of the electromagnetic field is the integral over all frequencies: $$ C = ∫₀^∞ ν log₂(1 + ε(ν)/kT) dν$$

    from 3.1

What would falsify it

  1. Information-Theoretic Reformation of Physics: Refutation of Quantization and Reconstruction from First Principles Author: Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas Affiliation: QNFO Contact: rowan.quni@qnfo.org ORCID: 0009-0002-4317-5604 ISNI: 0000 0005 2645 6062 DOI : https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/information-theoretic-reformation-of-physics/ Publication Date: 2025-09-22 Version : 1.0

    from An
  2. Revisiting the Rayleigh-Jeans Law: A Failure of Physical Assumption, Not Classical Physics The Rayleigh-Jeans law, derived from classical electromagnetism, predicts the spectral energy density $u(ν)$ of a blackbody cavity as the product of the mode density $N(ν) = (8πν²/c³)$ and the average energy per mode $ε(ν)$ (Rayleigh, 1900; Jeans, 1905).

    from 2.1
  3. The total energy density $U$, calculated by integrating the spectral energy density over all frequencies, diverges: $$$ U = ∫₀^∞ u_{RJ}(ν) dν = (8πkT/c³) ∫₀^∞ ν² dν → ∞ $$ $ This prediction of infinite energy, known as the ultraviolet catastrophe, demonstrates that the unconstrained application of the equipartition theorem is physically untenable.

    from 2.1

Where the claim stops

  1. Foundational Reorientation: Declaring Planck’s Constant a Historical Artifact and Establishing Finite Information as the New Axiom Physics must be reoriented around information-theoretic constraints rather than quantum mechanical assumptions.

    from 1.
  2. Planck’s constant does not represent an intrinsic property of physical systems but functions as a curve-fitting parameter derived from empirical blackbody radiation data.

    from 1.1
  3. This constraint prohibits the assumption of infinite energy modes or infinite information density.

    from 1.2

Where to read

  1. An1,815 words · 8 min
  2. 4.313 words · 1 min
  3. 5.217 words · 1 min
  4. 6.223 words · 1 min
  5. 7.222 words · 1 min
  6. 8.209 words · 1 min
  7. 9.158 words · 1 min
  8. 10.126 words · 1 min

Read from the paper itself: 41 sections, 3,363 words. Nothing in this digest is written by a model; a line that is not a sentence of the paper is not shown. Have a specific question? Ask this paper.

The full text · Ask the whole corpus