QNFO Papers

Open research library

Papers you can read, cite and question

611 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.

Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.

Energy per answer papers 8 papers

Platform builders, data-centre operators and energy analysts. What a correct answer costs in joules. Joules-per-Solution (JPCUB) definitions and measurements, Landauer and Margolus-Levitin limits, energy and power budgets, and energy benchmarking across quantum, HPC and AI hardware.

Benchmarking. Measurement protocols and comparative benchmarks Tagged papers: 13.

  1. Energy per answer

    A Cost-Model Benchmark for Mixed-State Quantum Simulation Workloads: Entanglement-Cost Anchors and Reuse-Aware Re-Entry Metrics

    Classical simulation of quantum circuits increasingly takes the form of repeated-run workloads—variational-parameter sweeps, noisy multishot studies, and error-correction cycles—rather than isolated executions, and the target states of such workloads are frequently mixed rather than pure. This paper…

  2. Energy per answerv2.0.0

    Quantum Computation Latency-Energy Tradeoff and the JPCUB Metric

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation trades latency against energy through the code distance: a larger distance d costs more syndrome rounds and more physical gates per logical operation, lengthening every operation and raising its energy. This paper computes that tradeoff for the rotated surface code…

  3. Energy per answerv2.0.0

    Revising the Joules-per-Compute (JPCUB) Benchmark: Normalizing Energy Efficiency by Logical-Qubit Operations

    Energy benchmarks for quantum processors are usually quoted per physical gate or per physical qubit, figures that hide the dominant cost of a fault-tolerant machine: the error-correction overhead that multiplies physical work by a distance-dependent factor before any logical operation is delivered.…

  4. Energy per answerv1.1.2

    Joules-per-Solution for Stochastic and Agentic Inference: Benchmarking Frontier and Agentic LLMs Against the Human Brain

    The joules-per-solution (J/S) metric, introduced in JPCUB P0 as a universal, physics-grounded measure of computational efficiency, assumed deterministic solvers: one run yields one solution. Large language models (LLMs) violate that assumption twice over: they are stochastic samplers whose outputs…

  5. Energy per answerv0.7

    The Qudit Advantage: System-Level Joules-per-Solution Comparison of a Qudit Architecture Against 17 Conventional Qubit Quantum Computing Platforms

    The JPCUB Competitive Landscape v2.0 benchmarked 17 qubit-based quantum computing platforms across a single system-level energy-efficiency metric: joules per solution (J/sol). All 17 platforms use two-level quantum systems (qubits). This paper extends the JPCUB framework to qudit architectures —…

  6. Energy per answerv2.3

    JPCUB Competitive Landscape v2.0: System-Level Joules-per-Solution Estimates for 17 Quantum Computing Platforms from Published Specifications

    The JPCUB P0 protocol (https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/joules-per-solution-metric/) defines the joules-per-solution metric — total system energy per correct answer — as a universal, physics-grounded benchmark for computational platforms. The qwav.tech competitive landscape displays six platforms with…

  7. Energy per answer

    The QWAV Decade: Enterprise p-Adic Computing 2025-2035

    Computing efficiency — measured by Joules Per Computational Unit (JPCUB †) — will be the dominant competitive axis in enterprise computing by 2035. This document forecasts the JPCUB ecosystem's evolution across three eras. Era 1: Benchmark (2025-2028) — JPCUB is validated against public hardware…

  8. Energy per answer

    The Joules-per-Solution Metric: Definition, Measurement Protocol, and Anti-Gaming Provisions for Honest Computational Benchmarking

    We define and formalize the joules-per-solution (J/S) metric as a universal, cross-domain measure of computational energy efficiency. The metric accounts for six energy components: computation, memory, I/O, cooling, power conversion, and amortized manufacturing. We provide a closed-form definition,…

New papers by email

One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.