QNFO Papers

Open research library

Papers you can read, cite and question

612 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.

Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.

Energy per answer papers 10 papers

Platform builders, data-centre operators and energy analysts. What a correct answer costs in joules. Joules-per-Solution (JPCUB) definitions and measurements, Landauer and Margolus-Levitin limits, energy and power budgets, and energy benchmarking across quantum, HPC and AI hardware.

Energy benchmarking. Measuring energy per result Tagged papers: 23.

  1. Energy per answer

    A Cost-Model Benchmark for Mixed-State Quantum Simulation Workloads: Entanglement-Cost Anchors and Reuse-Aware Re-Entry Metrics

    Classical simulation of quantum circuits increasingly takes the form of repeated-run workloads—variational-parameter sweeps, noisy multishot studies, and error-correction cycles—rather than isolated executions, and the target states of such workloads are frequently mixed rather than pure. This paper…

  2. Energy per answerv2.0.0

    The Switching Economics of Hamiltonian Re-Entry Computation: A Cost-Model Comparison with Stored-Program Architectures

    Stored-program (von Neumann) architectures pay a per-operation switching cost for instruction fetch, decode, and memory traffic, while a proposed Hamiltonian-computation paradigm identifies computation with continuous dynamical trajectories that re-enter a designated operating region of phase space.…

  3. Energy per answerv1.1.2

    Joules-per-Solution for Stochastic and Agentic Inference: Benchmarking Frontier and Agentic LLMs Against the Human Brain

    The joules-per-solution (J/S) metric, introduced in JPCUB P0 as a universal, physics-grounded measure of computational efficiency, assumed deterministic solvers: one run yields one solution. Large language models (LLMs) violate that assumption twice over: they are stochastic samplers whose outputs…

  4. Energy per answerv2.4.1

    QWAV Strategy v2.4.1: The Energy-Standard Playbook — Consortium Governance, Verified Precedents, and the JPCUB Road to a Quantum Computing Energy Benchmark

    QWAV Quantum Software possesses a validated technical differentiator in JPCUB, but the SaaS go-to-market model carries a structural weakness. This paper proposes the JPCUB Consortium model combined with grant-funded core R&D, transforming JPCUB from a single-vendor product into a multi-stakeholder…

  5. Energy per answerv2.3

    JPCUB Competitive Landscape v2.0: System-Level Joules-per-Solution Estimates for 17 Quantum Computing Platforms from Published Specifications

    The JPCUB P0 protocol (https://papers.qnfo.org/papers/joules-per-solution-metric/) defines the joules-per-solution metric — total system energy per correct answer — as a universal, physics-grounded benchmark for computational platforms. The qwav.tech competitive landscape displays six platforms with…

  6. Energy per answerv1.2

    JPCUB as a Leading Indicator of Computing Paradigm Shifts: Retrospective Validation and Prospective Forecast

    Abstract The computing industry lacks a single, cross-domain metric that can compare energy efficiency across fundamentally different paradigms — CPU, GPU, neuromorphic processor, in-memory accelerator, or spintronic logic. Traditional metrics (FLOPS, MIPS, transistor count) describe what already…

  7. Energy per answer

    The Joules-per-Solution Metric: Definition, Measurement Protocol, and Anti-Gaming Provisions for Honest Computational Benchmarking

    We define and formalize the joules-per-solution (J/S) metric as a universal, cross-domain measure of computational energy efficiency. The metric accounts for six energy components: computation, memory, I/O, cooling, power conversion, and amortized manufacturing. We provide a closed-form definition,…

  8. Energy per answer

    Spectral Dynamics and Thermodynamic Stability in the Arithmetic Quantum Framework

    The scalability of fault-tolerant quantum computing is currently obstructed by a “Thermodynamic Wall,” where the entropy generated by active error correction (QEC) cycles scales exponentially with the number of logical qubits. This research addresses the crisis by proposing a transition from active,…

  9. Energy per answer

    THERMODYNAMIC AND TOPOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ON BIOLOGICAL QUANTUM PROCESSING

    This study establishes a rigorous quantitative boundary between engineered quantum systems and biological matter, defined by the thermodynamic cost of information protection. By benchmarking the 2025 Google “Willow” superconducting processor—which requires cryogenic isolation (20 mK) and active…

  10. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Viability and the Universality of Feynman Matter

    The dominant paradigm for universal quantum computation, predicated on active error correction, is fundamentally constrained by a thermodynamic wall, a phase transition where the entropy produced by control operations catastrophically overwhelms the system. This study quantifies this constraint,…

New papers by email

One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.