The QNFO familyQNFOQWAVq08PapersAsk
QNFO Papers

Open research library

Papers you can read, cite and question

728 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.

Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.

Results for “error correction” 34 papers

  1. Error correction

    Ultrametric Tree Encoding for Passive Quantum Error Confinement: Support Confinement, Barrier Models, and the Limits of the Strong Triangle Inequality

    Scalable quantum computing is blocked by the overhead of active error correction: surface-code implementations require on the order of $10^{3}$ physical qubits per logical qubit, repeated syndrome extraction, and low-latency decoding. A recent proposal claims that encoding logical information on a…

  2. Error correction

    Passive Fault Tolerance via Bruhat–Tits Tree Codes: Exact Ball-Code Error Rates, Energy Barriers, and the Cooling Wall of Active Quantum Error Correction

    Large-scale quantum computation is gated by active error correction: stabilizer codes such as the surface code require physical-to-logical overheads of $10^{2}$–$10^{4}$, continuous syndrome measurement, and millikelvin refrigeration whose thermodynamic cost grows as the operating temperature falls.…

  3. Error correction

    Error Confinement Theorem for Ultrametric Decoders and Its Implications for Quantum Error Correction

    Fault‑tolerant quantum computing is impeded by the large qubit overhead required for active quantum error correction (QEC). Existing decoders either lack rigorous hierarchical guarantees or incur computational costs that scale with the full syndrome volume. We model a symmetric decoder with $p\ge 3$…

  4. Error correction

    Passive Quantum Error Correction via Ultrametric Geometry on Bruhat–Tits Trees

    Scalable quantum computing is limited by the thermodynamic overhead of active error‑correction cycles, which require repeated syndrome extraction, low‑latency decoding, and large ancilla resources. A quantitative gap exists: no fully derived account shows how non‑Archimedean (ultrametric) geometry…

  5. Error correction

    Ultrametric Passive Fault Tolerance on Bruhat–Tits Trees: Analytic Derivation and Quantitative Projections

    Quantum computing today is limited by the large physical‑to‑logical qubit overhead required for active error correction, which demands frequent syndrome extraction, low‑latency decoding, and extensive ancilla resources. A proposed alternative encodes logical information on the vertices of a $p$‑adic…

  6. Error correction

    Ultrametric Passive Fault Tolerance on Bruhat–Tits Trees: Analytic Derivation and Numerical Projections

    Fault‑tolerant quantum computation currently demands a physical‑to‑logical qubit overhead of $10^{2}$–$10^{4}$, a cost that limits near‑term scalability. A major gap is the lack of a passive protection mechanism that does not require syndrome extraction or additional ancilla qubits. We analytically…

  7. Error correction

    Regular Ternary Tree Codes and Symmetric Exponential Energy Barriers for Passive Quantum Error Correction

    Quantum error correction (QEC) currently relies on active syndrome extraction, which incurs large qubit overheads. A conjectured passive scheme encodes logical information on the vertices of a regular ternary Bruhat–Tits tree, exploiting the ultrametric triangle inequality to create an energy…

  8. Error correctionv1.0.1

    Ultrametric Passive Error Correction on \(p\)-ary Bruhat–Tits Trees: Barrier Analysis and Recursive Thresholds

    Fault‑tolerant quantum computation presently depends on active stabilizer codes such as the surface code, which require repeated syndrome extraction, low‑latency decoding, and large ancilla overhead. A fundamentally different approach would encode logical qubits on the vertices of a regular…

  9. Error correctionrev 4 Nov 2026v2.2.0

    Ultrametric Quantum Error Correction on Bruhat–Tits Trees: Energy Barriers, Classical Evidence, and the Quantization Question

    Passive fault tolerance—protection of logical qubits by encoding geometry alone, without repeated syndrome measurement—would remove the dominant overhead in scalable quantum computing if it could be made to work for quantum information rather than only for classical bits. We study a conjectured…

  10. Error correctionrev 19 Oct 2026v2.0.1

    Holographic Quantum Error Correction on Bruhat–Tits Trees: A Conditional Threshold and Resource Analysis at $10^{-4}$

    The holographic quantum error‑correction (QEC) architecture that implements encoding as a renormalization‑group (RG) flow on a Bruhat–Tits tree $\mathcal{T}_p$ claims a physical error‑rate threshold $\epsilon_{th}\ge10^{-4}$. No hardware data accompany the proposal, so we construct a fully explicit…

  11. Error correctionrev 3 Nov 2026v2.1.0

    Ultrametric Geometry as Passive Quantum Error Correction: Bruhat–Tits Qudit Codes and the Non-Archimedean Bound

    Active quantum error correction (QEC) dominates the overhead of scalable quantum processors, requiring repeated syndrome extraction, low-latency decoding, and large ancilla counts that inflate hardware cost and energy consumption. A passive alternative that eliminates measurement cycles would reduce…

  12. Error correctionrev 1 Nov 2026v3.0.0

    Planar Fluxonium‑Controlled Bosonic Error Correction: A Quantitative Error‑Budget Reassessment (Corrected Version)

    Bosonic quantum error correction (QEC) encodes a logical qubit in a single harmonic oscillator, promising fault tolerance with far fewer physical components than qubit‑based surface codes. Recent planar demonstrations using a heavy fluxonium ancilla report a bit‑flip lifetime of…

  13. Error correctionrev 13 Oct 2026v2.0.0

    Exact Maximum-Likelihood Quantum Decoding beyond Treewidth: A Structural Analysis of Rank-Decomposition Dynamic Programming

    Maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding is the optimal decoding rule for quantum error correction under stochastic Pauli noise, but exact evaluation of logical-class probabilities has required tensor-network contraction whose cost grows exponentially in the treewidth of the syndrome graph, blocking…

  14. Error correction

    CSS Codes for Quantum Metrology with Discrete-Time Error Correction: A Reconciled Quantitative Analysis

    Quantum metrology promises estimation precision scaling as the Heisenberg limit $\Delta\omega \sim 1/(NT)$ rather than the standard quantum limit (SQL) $\Delta\omega \sim 1/\sqrt{NT}$, but noise typically destroys this advantage. Recent work showed that when the noise is perpendicular to the sensing…

  15. Error correction

    Distinguishability-Induced Degradation of Monolithic Quantum Error Correction: A Reconciled Analytic Study of Syndrome-Checking Constraints

    Quantum error-correcting codes rely on the assumption that the environment cannot distinguish which error occurred on which codeword. Residual Zeeman, Stark, and anharmonic shifts in physical platforms break this assumption by imprinting error-dependent photon frequencies on the environment,…

  16. Error correction

    Error Correction Properties of Covariant Bosonic Encodings: A Quantitative Assessment

    Bosonic modes provide a hardware‑efficient substrate for quantum error correction (QEC) because logical information can be encoded in continuous‑variable states with built‑in symmetries. Recent work introduced a representation‑theoretic framework in which a physical representation of a finite group,…

  17. Error correction

    The Scaling Paradox of Surface-Code Quantum Error Correction: Exponential Suppression, Logarithmic Overhead, and a Landauer Floor That Grows with Reliability

    Surface-code quantum error correction (QEC) is widely regarded as the leading route to fault-tolerant quantum computation, yet its resource story contains an under-examined tension we call the scaling paradox: the code suppresses logical errors exponentially in code distance $d$, so the…

  18. Error correctionrev 13 Oct 2026v2.0.0

    Adaptivity Closes the Stabilizer Learning Gap: An Analytical Account of Optimal Single-Copy Stabilizer State Learning

    Stabilizer states underpin quantum error correction, device benchmarking, and the classical simulation of quantum circuits, yet their learnability shows a sample-complexity gap: an $n$-qubit stabilizer state can be identified from $\Theta(n)$ copies using joint two-copy Bell measurements, while…

  19. Error correction

    Error Attribution as a Resource-Allocation Principle for Quantum Error Correction: Sensitivity-Guided Noise Reduction and Its Analytic Limits

    Logical error rate is the standard benchmark for quantum error correction (QEC), but it is an aggregate quantity: it says nothing about which circuit components actually drive logical failure. Recent work introduced an error attribution scheme that computes per-component sensitivities…

  20. Error correction

    Low-Overhead Quantum Error Correction with Boundary-Connected Planar Modules: A Reconciled Quantitative Assessment

    The planar surface code protects quantum information robustly but pays for its two-dimensional layout with an encoding rate that vanishes as the distance grows, so fault-tolerant memories require hundreds to thousands of physical qubits per logical qubit. A recent proposal constructs modular…

  21. Error correctionrev 19 Oct 2026v2.0.0

    Code-Agnostic Graph Neural Network Decoding from Detection Error Models: A Reconciled Quantitative and Structural Assessment

    Graph neural network (GNN) decoders for quantum error correction have traditionally been tied to specific code families through their input representations. The POLYMECHANON decoder [1, 2] proposes a contract in which the sole input is the detection error model (DEM)—a tripartite graph of detectors,…

  22. Error correction

    Ensemble Dependence of Critical Exponents at Quantum Error Correction Thresholds: Analytic Mechanisms and Statistical Consequences

    Ensemble equivalence — the expectation that microcanonical, canonical, and grand-canonical descriptions of a system agree in the thermodynamic limit — is a cornerstone of statistical mechanics, yet it can fail for observables that probe exponentially rare events. Recent work on a simplified quantum…

  23. Error correctionrev 19 Oct 2026v2.0.1

    Holographic Quantum Error Correction as AdS/CFT Renormalization‑Group Flow on Bruhat–Tits Trees: A Conditional Threshold Analysis at $10^{-4}$

    Quantum error‑correction (QEC) thresholds determine whether physical error rates can be suppressed to arbitrarily low logical error probabilities. A recent proposal encodes logical information as a renormalization‑group (RG) flow on a $p$‑adic Bruhat–Tits tree $\mathcal{T}_p$, with a bosonic…

  24. Error correctionrev 29 Oct 2026v1.0.0

    Implications for Computing and Quantum Error Correction

    The anchor paper introduced the branch-depth reading: the p-adic valuation $v_p(n)$ is a measure of depth along a prime branch of the integer factorization tree (not a measure of size), and because the tensor product multiplies Hilbert-space dimensions, $v_2(\dim H) = n$ counts tensor-branch depth…

  25. Error correctionv1.11.0

    Archimedean Shadows: The QEC-Darwinism Tradeoff in Ultrametric Spaces

    Maity et al. (arXiv:2608.03944, 2026) proved that quantum error correction and Quantum Darwinism cannot coexist above a critical logical fidelity $F_L > 0.874$ — a tight, model-independent no-go theorem establishing an exact tradeoff between protected quantum information and emergent classical…

  26. Error correctionv1.1.0

    Passive Error Resilience Through Ultrametric Geometry: A Proposal for p-Adic Quantum Metrology

    Active quantum error correction is the dominant paradigm for achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation, but its thermodynamic cost at utility scale remains unaddressed. Each round of syndrome extraction, decoding, and feedback erases information — and under Landauer's principle, that erasure…

  27. Error correction

    Adelic Quantum Error Correction: A Synthesis Across All Primes v1.0.0

    The $p$-adic quantum error correction program has developed three independent but connected strands: a mathematical theory of $p$-adic stabilizer codes (Phase A), an experimental protocol to test for ultrametric error structure (Phase B), and a hardware co-design proposal for tree-structured qubit…

  28. Error correctionv0.1.1

    Adelic Quantum Error Correction: Code Constructions Beyond the Stabilizer Formalism

    Heydeman, Marcolli, Parikh, and Saberi (2018) demonstrated that holographic quantum error-correcting codes can be constructed on a single $p$-adic Bruhat-Tits tree using perfect tensor networks. This paper extends their result to the adelic setting: the simultaneous use of ALL $p$-adic…

  29. Error correctionrev 14 Sep 2026v2.0.0

    Adelic Quantum Error Correction: Intrinsic Qubit Protection from Ostrowski

    We formalize an adelic approach to quantum error correction (QEC) based on Ostrowski's theorem: the only non-trivial completions of the rational numbers are the Archimedean (real) completion $\mathbb{R}$ and the p-adic completions $\mathbb{Q}_p$, and these topologies are mutually singular. The…

  30. Error correction

    Computational Simulation of Geometric Orientation Codes

    Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires robust error correction traditionally met using planar topologies that assume noise is perfectly isotropic. However, recent astrophysical measurements suggest the universe possesses fundamental anisotropic properties. This paper challenges the isotropic…

  31. Error correctionv1.1.2

    Computational Toy Model of Non-Local Information Storage in a Quantum Cellular Automaton

    Can local, unitary dynamics generate the kind of non-local information storage that holographic quantum error correction requires? This paper revisits that question with a fully reproducible, exact state-vector simulation of a twelve-qubit quantum cellular automaton (QCA) evolving under the…

  32. Error correctionrev 14 Sep 2026v2.0.0

    Qudit Quantum Error Correction

    The observation that positional notation carries a native ultrametric tree structure extends into quantum computing through the tensor-product architecture of qubit registers. We formalize three theses: (I) a tree-topology quantum processor confines errors to subtrees via the strong triangle…

  33. Error correction

    Lifecycle of a Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer

    The operational lifetime of a fault-tolerant quantum computer is fundamentally a race between the inevitable, continuous degradation of its physical hardware and the escalating resource cost of the classical computation required for the error correction to compensate. This dynamic process defines a…

  34. Error correction

    Stabilization of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States

    Harmonic oscillators enable hardware-efficient quantum error correction through the redundancy of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Conventional stabilization relies on measurement-based feedback, which is limited by detection latency and recoil heating in trapped ion systems. We propose an…

New papers by email

One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.

Keep exploring

One body of research, three doors.