Open research library
Papers you can read, cite and question
728 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.
Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.
Results for “error correction” 3 papers
Benchmarking. Measurement protocols and comparative benchmarks Tagged papers: 15.
Adaptivity Closes the Stabilizer Learning Gap: An Analytical Account of Optimal Single-Copy Stabilizer State Learning
Stabilizer states underpin quantum error correction, device benchmarking, and the classical simulation of quantum circuits, yet their learnability shows a sample-complexity gap: an $n$-qubit stabilizer state can be identified from $\Theta(n)$ copies using joint two-copy Bell measurements, while…
Revising the Joules-per-Compute (JPCUB) Benchmark: Normalizing Energy Efficiency by Logical-Qubit Operations
Energy benchmarks for quantum processors are usually quoted per physical gate or per physical qubit, figures that hide the dominant cost of a fault-tolerant machine: the error-correction overhead that multiplies physical work by a distance-dependent factor before any logical operation is delivered.…
The Qudit Advantage: System-Level Joules-per-Solution Comparison of a Qudit Architecture Against 17 Conventional Qubit Quantum Computing Platforms
Prior work benchmarked 17 qubit-based quantum computing platforms across the joules-per-solution (JPCUB) energy-efficiency metric. All 17 platforms use two-level quantum systems (qubits). This paper extends the JPCUB framework to qudit architectures — d-level quantum systems — and computes a…
New papers by email
One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.