Open research library
Papers you can read, cite and question
728 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.
Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.
Results for “joules” 3 papers
Funding & strategy. Funder, market and programme strategy Tagged papers: 40.
QWAV Strategy v2.4.1: The Energy-Standard Playbook — Consortium Governance, Verified Precedents, and the JPCUB Road to a Quantum Computing Energy Benchmark
Quantum computation is known to possess theoretical energy-consumption advantages over classical computation — Meier and Yamasaki proved an exponential energy advantage on Simon's problem (arXiv:2305.11212), and Fellous-Asiani et al. demonstrated full-stack resource-efficiency optimization regimes…
Institutional Reform: Fixing the Epistemic Incentive Structure of Post-Classical Computing
The first four papers in this series established that quantum computing's failure is epistemic (Phase I), surveyed alternatives (Phase II), examined physical limits (Phase III), and proposed an investment portfolio (Phase IV). This paper addresses the institutional question: why did $35 billion of…
Manifesto for Honest Computation
Five papers have traced an arc from diagnosis to prescription. The qubit is a scaffold, not an invariant. Alternative paradigms exist. Physical limits are real. A diversified portfolio is rational. Institutions must be reformed. This final paper --- the Manifesto --- synthesizes these findings into…
New papers by email
One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.