Open research library
Papers you can read, cite and question
728 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.
Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.
Results for “distinction” 3 papers
What Makes a Measure “Genuinely Natural”? Bits, Nats, and the Audit of Naturalness Claims in Measurement, Information, and Language
The adjective “natural” is invoked across quantitative sciences to suggest privileged status for units, conventions, or datasets. This paper formalizes three explicit criteria for a measurement convention to be genuinely natural—ratio/relabeling invariance, additivity, and constant‑freedom—and…
Epistemic Disturbance in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: State-Preserving Actions, Four-Valued Assessments, and the Distinction between Capability and Intention
In the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), a decision maker (DM) either moves the conflict to another state or does nothing, and every action that leaves the state unchanged is silently classified as inaction. Yet announcements, exercises of rights, leaks, and selective disclosures leave the…
The Consilience of the QNFO Keyword Taxonomy: Ultrametric Structure as a Testable Compression Prior
The QNFO research program spans seven domains — ultrametric physics, the laws of form, infomatics, paradigm engineering, consilience research, the QWAV platform, and interactive demos — and maintains a canonical keyword taxonomy of 335 terms used to scope external discovery. A recurring claim in the…
New papers by email
One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.