The QNFO familyQNFOQWAVq08PapersAsk
QNFO Papers

Open research library

Papers you can read, cite and question

728 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.

Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.

Results for “topological” 4 papers

  1. AI & knowledgev1.0.1

    Cocycle Solving in Cognition: Ultrametric Reaction Times and Analogy Depth

    Cognitive consistency and analogical difficulty are pervasive challenges for psychologists, educators, and artificial‑intelligence designers. Existing Euclidean models cannot capture the hierarchical constraints that appear in belief networks and analogy spaces. We therefore propose a formalism in…

  2. AI & knowledgerev 29 Oct 2026v1.0.0

    The Universal Ignorance Audit: A Fifteen-Question Method for Systematic Inquiry into the Structure of Not-Knowing

    The Universal Ignorance Audit is a fifteen-question, five-phase method for systematically interrogating the structure of not-knowing in any domain. Where conventional epistemic tools treat ignorance as an absence to be filled, the audit treats it as an active, structured state with architecture:…

  3. AI & knowledge

    Proof-of-Concept for Auditable Attention using Ultrametric Tree Distances

    The dominance of high-dimensional Euclidean vector spaces in contemporary transformer architectures has precipitated an interpretability crisis, as continuous geometric embeddings can obscure the causal mechanisms of semantic attention. This paper presents a formal proof-of-concept for a…

  4. AI & knowledge

    PILE OF BABEL

    Modern theoretical physics is experiencing a crisis of comprehension characterized by the proliferation of abstract, specialized terminology that obscures fundamental, intuitive concepts. This phenomenon, termed a new scholasticism, has led to a failure of conceptual compression, wherein simple…

New papers by email

One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.

Keep exploring

One body of research, three doors.