QNFO Papers

Open research library

Papers you can read, cite and question

612 papers from the QNFO program, filed on nine shelves by the reader each one is written for: energy per answer, error correction, physics, numbers and p-adics, logic and formalism, AI and knowledge, autonomous systems, assessments, and cross-cutting essays. Every page renders its mathematics and can be questioned in place. How a living paper works.

Looking for an answer rather than a paper? Ask the whole corpus: answers cite the papers they come from.

Energy per answer papers 19 papers

Platform builders, data-centre operators and energy analysts. What a correct answer costs in joules. Joules-per-Solution (JPCUB) definitions and measurements, Landauer and Margolus-Levitin limits, energy and power budgets, and energy benchmarking across quantum, HPC and AI hardware.

Thermodynamic budgets. Thermodynamic and energy accounting Tagged papers: 47.

  1. Energy per answerv2.0.0

    Thermodynamic Divergence of Active Quantum Error Correction Overhead: A Kapitza-Limited Feasibility Threshold for Gate-Based Architectures

    Active quantum error correction (QEC) is conventionally analyzed as an algorithmic resource problem: how many physical qubits and gate cycles are needed per logical qubit. We propose a complementary thermodynamic feasibility criterion. In a gate-based architecture, every QEC cycle is driven by…

  2. Energy per answer

    The Resource Burden of Active Quantum Error Correction: A Scaling Analysis of Qubit, Bandwidth, and Energy Overheads

    Active quantum error correction (QEC) protects quantum information only by continuously consuming physical resources: qubits, measurement bandwidth, classical processing, and energy. While the theoretical foundations of QEC are mature, the resource burden of running a code—rather than constructing…

  3. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Budgeting for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing: A Three-Layer Energy Model with Explicit Arithmetic and a 15-Month Validation Roadmap

    Hybrid quantum-classical (HQC) computing is the dominant near-term paradigm, yet its energy accounting is rarely made explicit: the classical control, readout, cryogenic, and orchestration hardware surrounding the quantum processing unit (QPU) can dominate the total power budget, eroding any…

  4. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Trade-off Frontiers for Neuromorphic Processors: A Quantum-Inspired Non-Equilibrium Model of the Energy–Speed Boundary

    Neuromorphic processors promise order-of-magnitude gains in energy efficiency, but no predictive framework currently connects device-level dissipation to system-level computational throughput. We develop a non-equilibrium thermodynamic model in which a neuromorphic processor is treated as a driven,…

  5. Energy per answerv2.0.2

    The Margolus-Levitin Bound and Energy-Time Limits for Quantum Computation at the Landauer Scale

    The Margolus-Levitin (ML) bound establishes a fundamental limit on the speed of quantum evolution, stating that a system with mean energy $\langle H \rangle$ above its ground state requires a minimum time $\tau \ge \pi\hbar/(2\langle H\rangle)$ to evolve between orthogonal states. This preprint…

  6. Energy per answerv2.0.1

    Landauer-Limit Energy Floor and JPCUB Normalization for Cryogenic Quantum Control Electronics

    Cryogenic quantum control electronics dissipate energy many orders of magnitude above the thermodynamic minimum implied by Landauer's principle, and the gap matters for the joules-per-compute economics of fault-tolerant machines. This paper computes the Landauer floor for a rotated surface-code…

  7. Energy per answerv1.7

    Error Correction Is a Landauer Machine: The Thermodynamic Floor of Quantum Error-Correction Overhead

    Every cycle of active (measurement-based) quantum error correction is an erasure process priced by Landauer's principle at no less than kT ln 2 per erased bit; correction overhead therefore converges to a positive thermodynamic floor, (n-k)/k * kT ln 2 per logical qubit per round for an n,k…

  8. Energy per answer

    The Joules-per-Solution Metric: Definition, Measurement Protocol, and Anti-Gaming Provisions for Honest Computational Benchmarking

    We define and formalize the joules-per-solution (J/S) metric as a universal, cross-domain measure of computational energy efficiency. The metric accounts for six energy components: computation, memory, I/O, cooling, power conversion, and amortized manufacturing. We provide a closed-form definition,…

  9. Energy per answerv2.0.0

    The Physics of Computation: Fundamental Limits and the Honest Boundaries of Post-Classical Computing

    Phase III of the Qubit Delusion series. Examines fundamental physical limits on computation: Landauer bound, Margolus-Levitin theorem, Bremermann limit, Bekenstein bound. Shows that quantum error-correction overhead (1e2-1e3 physical operations per logical operation) multiplies thermodynamic cost…

  10. Energy per answer

    Quantum Abacus

    The scalability of active, gate-based quantum computers is fundamentally challenged by the “Thermodynamic Wall,” where the heat from control electronics becomes prohibitive. This study computationally investigates the “Quantum Abacus,” a passive quantum computing architecture that circumvents this…

  11. Energy per answer

    Spectral Dynamics and Thermodynamic Stability in the Arithmetic Quantum Framework

    The scalability of fault-tolerant quantum computing is currently obstructed by a “Thermodynamic Wall,” where the entropy generated by active error correction (QEC) cycles scales exponentially with the number of logical qubits. This research addresses the crisis by proposing a transition from active,…

  12. Energy per answer

    Autonomous Dissipative Quantum Processing

    Current quantum computing architectures face a thermodynamic bottleneck where the energy cost of classical error correction scales superlinearly with system size. Reliance on exogenous classical control imposes a latency and power penalty that renders hybrid paradigms unscalable for exascale…

  13. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Veto

    The realization of commercially viable, fault-tolerant quantum computing is precluded not by engineering immaturity but by a fundamental percolation phase transition driven by correlated noise and thermodynamic constraints, which render the required system scales physically uncorrectable. The status…

  14. Energy per answer

    Escaping the Millikelvin Death Spiral

    Standard quantum architectures rely on dilution refrigeration to suppress thermal noise, tethering the industry to a non-scalable 20 mK thermal floor. The cooling power at millikelvin temperatures scales poorly, creating a “mainframe constraint” that limits widespread deployment. Here, a 4-Kelvin…

  15. Energy per answer

    THERMODYNAMIC AND TOPOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ON BIOLOGICAL QUANTUM PROCESSING

    This study establishes a rigorous quantitative boundary between engineered quantum systems and biological matter, defined by the thermodynamic cost of information protection. By benchmarking the 2025 Google “Willow” superconducting processor—which requires cryogenic isolation (20 mK) and active…

  16. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Imperative

    Standard quantum computing paradigms assume that minimizing temperature is the primary pathway to coherence, driving massive investment in millikelvin dilution refrigeration. However, a fundamental thermodynamic paradox remains unsolved: cooling capacity scales superlinearly with temperature…

  17. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Scaling of 4-Kelvin Topological Processors

    Standard superconducting quantum processors are currently constrained by the thermodynamic bottleneck of millikelvin dilution refrigeration, which precludes the integration of high-speed control logic and limits scalability. This reliance on the 20 mK regime creates a “mainframe constraint” where…

  18. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamic Viability and the Universality of Feynman Matter

    The dominant paradigm for universal quantum computation, predicated on active error correction, is fundamentally constrained by a thermodynamic wall, a phase transition where the entropy produced by control operations catastrophically overwhelms the system. This study quantifies this constraint,…

  19. Energy per answer

    Thermodynamics of Structural Persistence (Topological Memory)

    The prevailing paradigm in quantum information preservation—active intervention—relies on continuous, energy-intensive error correction cycles to suppress entropic decay. This approach faces a fundamental scaling limitation: the latency horizon, where the time delay of the control loop exceeds the…

New papers by email

One short weekly digest: titles and links. No tracking; unsubscribe any time.